Add your company website/link
to this blog page for only $40 Purchase now!Continue
FutureStarrGold Prices on the Rise - What Does This Mean For Miners?
Rising gold prices have resulted in increased cash costs, which negatively impacts miners. About 47% of all-in costs are driven by energy costs, which feed through to higher diesel and electricity prices. In turn, higher costs negatively impact price performance. This article outlines the main reasons for rising energy costs in the mining sector.
Higher energy costs are one of the most significant factors that affect gold miners. Rising oil prices feed through to higher prices of diesel and electricity, which puts further upward pressure on gold miners' costs. While the strength of the US dollar will help reduce some of the pressure on rising energy costs, the escalating input costs will continue to pressure gold miners' margins. The deteriorating grade of gold ore is also a major factor, with miners forced to dig deeper into the rock to extract the precious metal.
Gold miners face a steep growth path ahead. Although the price of gold is already high, it will continue to rise in the coming years as energy costs rise. This is partly due to the fact that the price of gold is determined by the US dollar and is thus dependent on the strength of the dollar. In addition to this, gold prices are also being driven by economic instability, which will increase the cost of mining.
Gold mining companies do not report their operating costs separately. Some break down their cash costs by category, while others report contractor costs separately. In addition, some companies break down their costs by site maintenance and labor separately. This means that the energy per ounce mined for two companies could be the same. But if one company produces its own electricity, it will use less energy than another that buys its electricity from a third party. Therefore, CDP data is not suitable for comparisons between companies, but is suitable for comparing industry-wide average energy costs.
The highest source of direct energy in the gold mining industry is oil. This will likely remain the case for the foreseeable future. However, some miners have locked in fuel contracts, so the impact of higher energy prices will be felt much later, in 2022.
Energy costs also influence the cost of consumables for gold miners. About 70% of gold miners spend a portion of their cost on consumables. The amount they spend on consumables accounts for about 20% of their overall operating costs.
AISC prices are a key measurement of gold producers' operating costs. While they do not include all costs involved in gold production, AISC provides a window into the costs of maintaining current output and sustaining future output. In addition to operating costs, gold miners also spend money on exploration and study activities to extend production into the future.
The cost of diesel and electricity is one of the major components of AISC. It includes salaries and other costs, but excludes depreciation and overhead. The other components of AISC include refining and transportation. Higher energy costs feed through to higher AISC prices for miners, which means lower profit margins for these companies.
The rise in energy prices is also consistent with the trend of declining ore grades. However, as energy costs rise, so do gold prices. For instance, if energy prices double in a year, gold prices should increase by 50%. It will then gradually reflect the full price change. Historically, gold prices have been relatively stable when priced in energy.
Direct energy costs are relatively easy to track. The process of gold mining is energy intensive, and even the simplest open pit mining method requires large amounts of fuel and electricity to keep the equipment cool. In addition, gold mining companies must process the ore, which is a highly energy intensive process. Consequently, most gold mining companies report their direct energy costs.
Higher diesel and electricity costs are a major driver of higher AISC prices. However, these costs are only one part of the cost of mining. Mining and refining are also a significant contributor to AISC prices. As a result, higher AISC prices mean higher profit margins for gold miners.
While Fekola Mine reported higher cash operating costs in 2021, they were still well within their original guidance range, at $469/ounce in 2021. The increase in cash operating costs was partly offset by lower waste stripping and higher production. Ultimately, AISC was $765 per ounce sold, which was close to the midpoint of the guidance range.
AISC (All-in-Sustaining Costs) is a measure of the costs that miners incur in the mining process. The recent rise in AISC was due in part to higher labour costs, higher electricity and diesel costs, and rising commodity prices. Higher costs are likely to add to the downward pressure on gold prices. While the US dollar's strength will provide some relief from inflationary pressure, it will not make up for the rising cost of inputs. The resulting price decline will further pressure higher-cost producers.
AISCs are calculated using a number of factors. One factor is the grade of gold being mined. In general, mines with better grades will have lower AISCs. In addition, open-cut mines tend to cost less to operate than underground ones. In addition, AISCs vary from month to month and year to year.
AISCs are also helpful in gauging the feasibility of a project. However, they do not include the upfront capital costs that miners must incur. These upfront costs are commonly referred to as upfront capital expenditures. In some ways, AISC is similar to other industry measures like the cost of goods sold and cost of doing business.
This paper looks at the experience of economic redistribution in the United States, Sweden, Canada and Japan. Countries with high levels of redistribution have increased economic growth during the post-WWII period, while countries with low redistribution rates have decreased economic growth during that period. During this period, countries with low redistribution levels increased their tax and spending policies, which reduced their growth rates.
There is a large body of research examining the determinants of economic redistribution preferences. Some studies have found that people are more or less influenced by their social identity and the manifestation of meritocratic beliefs within a social system. Others have found that redistribution preferences are determined by economic circumstances.
These studies suggest that the degree to which people support economic redistribution is dependent on the level of inequality. They find that individuals with higher incomes are less likely to favor redistribution than individuals with lower incomes. These results are consistent with the theory of self-interest preferences. Interestingly, the only income category that is statistically significant is the best income category, which is the most comfortable. The researchers also find that religion has an effect on redistributive preferences.
While these findings suggest that people are more likely to support redistribution in the United States, there is still considerable room for further research. For instance, one recent study examined the influence of social class on people's perceptions of economic inequality. The authors found that participants in Norway were less likely to accept and implement unfair distributions than Americans. This study, however, did not account for the institutional differences between the countries.
Although research on redistribution preferences has increased in recent decades, there are still many gaps in our knowledge. While income inequality is the most prominent factor, wealth inequality has received less attention. Future research should investigate whether wealth inequality influences redistribution preferences in similar ways.
The experience of redistribution is a key factor in understanding inequality. But how does the experience of redistribution affect attitudes towards the issue? In this article, we'll discuss three ways to understand redistribution. The first is to identify the factors that influence redistribution preferences.
Inequality is a major determinant of redistribution preferences, and the perceived relative position of people in society matters greatly. But the type of inequality people feel should be corrected is complex, and depends on several factors, including geographic disaggregation, underlying causes, and historical patterns.
Higher levels of inequality are associated with less support for redistribution and greater acceptance of inequality. These findings are particularly strong in the United States and the United Kingdom, both of which have high levels of inequality. However, evidence is mixed. According to Sands (2017), exposure to inequality decreases support for economic redistribution. However, this effect is strongest among politically left-leaning subjects.
Changing demographics are also critical to the supply of labor. As mortality rates decline and people live longer, the supply of labor increases. In the United States, for example, the demographic change that took place after the 1970s occurred when more women and baby boomers entered the workforce. This increase in prime-age workers meant that potential growth rates were three to four percent higher, compared to earlier decades.
In addition to monetary policy, changes in demographics affect how interest rates are transmitted in an economy. The older population tends to hold more assets than the young, making it easier for the older population to borrow and be a creditor. Conversely, the younger generation has fewer assets and faces tighter credit constraints.
Political competition and the experience of economic redistriction may seem contradictory, but they do go hand in hand. Economic redistribution programs are usually financed by government programs and receive political support. This is due to legislative logrolling, a practice which favors programs that transfer wealth to the nonpoor. But political competition does not create greater equality in income distribution, and the poor still receive far less than non-poor people.
Similarly, decentralized competition among local governments can result in substantial redistribution. However, the level of redistribution that can be achieved with this system decreases as homeowner participation increases. Furthermore, redistribution preferences of homeowners differ due to the capital losses that they experience.
Redistribution policies can alleviate inequality and increase economic growth, depending on the policies enacted by governments. However, these programs can be costly and undermine economic growth. While they can provide some benefits to the poor, they also entail a high level of government expenditure.
In this article, we investigate the joint effects of political and economic inequalities on redistributive taxation and institutional quality. We find that, on average, income inequality reduces the efficiency of redistributive institutions, while political bias favors the rich. These effects are particularly significant in a context of decreasing productive investment, which may have uncertain implications for economic growth.
The term "institution" is used by economists to refer to economic structures and institutions, which are the necessary conditions for distributing scarce resources. These institutions include property rights, an honest government, a stable legal system, and free, competitive markets. In addition to these, economic institutions also include government agencies, private foundations, and private research agencies.
Institutions play an important role in redistribution, since they protect economic rights and support economic policy. However, their performance is also dependent on the economic structure of a country. For example, institutions are more effective in more developed countries because they tend to have a higher ratio of private sector production to the GDP. However, this structural difference is also reflected in the costs of enforcing such institutions. Hence, these institutions are selectively enforced in less developed countries.
In this paper, we also explore the political aspects of these institutions. We find that the performance of institutions depends on the type of political system in a country. In contrast, "inclusive" institutions do not work in limited access societies.
One of the most important issues facing today's economy is slow overall growth. As such, prescriptions for a faster growth rate often entail policies that increase the overall distribution of income. This is known as progressive redistribution. This policy has a positive impact on the economy, but it can also have negative effects on growth.
Inequality has increased over the last few decades primarily because of policy changes. Since the mid-1970s, a range of economic policies has been adopted to redistribute income to households at the top. These changes include the near abandonment of full employment as a policy goal, lower tax rates for the rich, deregulation of the financial system, and measures that reduced labor standards and bargaining power for low-wage workers.
While the link between economic redistribution and growth has been studied extensively, the evidence suggests that there is no clear link between redistribution and growth. Some redistributive policies, such as taxing the rich and reducing income taxes, can actually harm overall growth, while other redistributive measures can boost the economy and its overall growth.
One problem in America's tax system is that the tax rates on wages and wealth are far too low. These policies exacerbate the inequality problem in society. As a result, the concentration of income and wealth has reached historic levels, despite lower taxes on the wealthy. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, passed in December 2017, has only made this problem worse.
A variety of studies have attempted to explain the social consequences of redistribution. Some of them use surveys, others focus on opinion polls and political party support. Several studies have also examined how redistribution affects people's preferences for income. For example, some studies have examined the effects of redistribution on individuals' preferences for higher tax rates and fewer public benefits. Others use experimental methods to study individuals' preferences for economic redistribution and the relationship between redistribution and risk aversion.
The World Economic Forum publishes data on social mobility. It also produces a global social mobility index. This index compares the relative position of one household to another at different points in time. Among other things, it measures how far a person can advance in the same area as their parents and grandparents.
One study has measured income mobility by measuring the probability of moving between quintiles. Using a metric called the Shorrocks index, it shows that households are less likely to stay in the same income quintile year after year. A household with a Shorrocks index of 1 has a 20% chance of moving.
The "prospect of upward mobility" hypothesis has also been studied. According to this hypothesis, people overestimate their chances of upward mobility, while they underestimate their chances of moving downward. However, these attitudes are influenced by social status and political views. For example, people who are poorer or conservative are more likely to overestimate their chances of upward and downward mobility. These findings have been confirmed in several studies.
If you're looking for quotes from Henry Ford, you've come to the right place. This book contains quotes from the autobiography of the automaker. This article discusses the importance of secondary sources when quoting Henry Ford.
A number of Henry Ford quotes are published in Ford News. These quotations are attributed to reliable secondary sources, such as published interviews and Ford Times articles. Not all of them are cited, however. It is possible that Ford never actually said the quote.
Henry Ford was a successful entrepreneur and innovator. His success was partly due to capitalism. However, this quotation is not included in a list of notable quotations from The Henry Ford, a museum dedicated to his inventions in Dearborn, Michigan.
Despite the fact that he did not invent the assembly line or the use of interchangeable parts, his Model T paved the way for the first mass-market automobile. He also developed a moving assembly line process that lowered production costs and kept prices low. This led to the creation of a rapidly growing market.
Henry Ford famously stated: "You can do anything if you think you can." He also said that you must believe you can do something or you cannot. This is still an old adage, but it has been modified in many ways over the years.
One of the most important steps in tracing a quote is to find the source of the quotation. Secondary sources are documents written after the events that prompted the quote. They contain facts and ideas that are not the opinions of the writer. As a result, they must be cited in footnotes. You can only use a quote from a secondary source if the writer is an authority in the field.
Henry Ford's autobiography is a fascinating read that gives us a look at the man behind the Ford Motor Company. This autobiography details Ford's life, his business strategies, and his philosophy. It is also packed with nuggets and useful tools. It will provide you with valuable information on how you can be successful in business.
The book is extremely readable and a good introduction makes it easy to read. The facts and personal experiences in this book are well researched and can be life-changing for some people. It is also a rare book to find an original dust jacket. While Ford was a pacifist during the first years of World War I, he promoted antisemitic literature, including The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and The International Jew.
Henry Ford began his career as an apprentice in Detroit. He later became an engineer at the Edison Illuminating Company and was promoted to chief engineer two years later. His passion for engineering led him to build a gasoline-powered horseless carriage and become a chief engineer for the company. He also developed the first Ford Model T automobile. His first production model was completed in 1893 and he and his wife Clara had a son named Edsel Bryant.
As a pioneer in the manufacturing industry, Henry Ford was responsible for transforming the way people live in the United States. His innovations shaped the economy, the social structure, and the character of the American middle class. By the time Ford died, five out of eight Americans lived in cities. In fact, it was a case of reverse urbanization - the idea that a large part of the population lived in the cities, instead of the countryside.
The first-born son of William and Mary Ford, Henry left his home at the age of 16 to become an apprentice machinist. He later returned to the family farm for three years, working in the factories and operating steam engines. He married Clara Bryant in 1888. In addition to this, he created the first Model T automobile, which made mass production possible. In the early 20th century, the Ford Motor Company was able to produce one Model T every twenty-four seconds.
Ford's autobiography is filled with stories about his life and career. The 83rd birthday celebration of his father was celebrated by 50,000 people in Dearborn. In addition to this, the American Petroleum Institute awarded Henry Ford the Ford Gold Medal for his contributions to humanity. In addition, the United States government honored Ford with a Model T stamp and a Businessman of the Century award in 1999.
Ford also started his own business, which led to the creation of the Ford Motor Company. His interest in the automobile industry led him to invest in various companies and properties in Detroit and across the world. Ford also started a series of hydroelectric plants and instituted a college in Essex, England.
As the wedding season is in full swing, the demand for gold and silver is increasing. However, the escalating Dollar strength and rate hikes have hurt the price of the yellow metal. As a result, Gold and Silver prices today fell by 1.3 percent to Rs 48,114 a kilogram.
As demand for silver in India grows, the price of silver has risen over the years. Rising industrialization and higher import duties have contributed to the increase in the price of silver in the country. The US Dollar Index is also an important factor in determining the price of silver in India. A rising US Dollar can cause the price of silver to decrease, while a falling one can raise it.
Silver prices are determined by several factors, including international trading and the demand for the metal. The price of silver depends on its supply and demand, as well as the value of gold. It is used in many industrial applications, including jewellery, film photography, and solar panels.
Silver is a non-ferrous metal that is ductile and malleable. It is also a good conductor of electricity. Most of the silver used in India is imported. This makes it an attractive commodity for investors. The price of silver in India depends largely on local demand, as well as international trends in price.
Silver prices fell sharply on Monday in Mumbai as the rupee gained value versus the US dollar. A stronger dollar and concerns over rate hikes pushed gold prices lower. Silver prices plunged by Rs 1,132 per kg on Monday.
Silver is traded on the Multi Commodity Exchange (MCX) market. There are different types of trading activity, such as spot and futures. In general, the price of an asset depends on a variety of factors, including demand, buying, selling, and supply. Today, the prices of silver on the MCX are affected by the volume of trading and other factors.
There are still a number of concerns in the gold and silver markets, including concerns over inflation and the risk of a recession. Meanwhile, the US dollar remains at a 20-year high, while treasury yields continue to climb. A number of investors are hoping that Fed chair Powell will provide clear guidance on how much longer the Fed will raise interest rates and when it will pull them back.
Gold and silver prices ended the week mixed. Gold slipped 2.5% while silver climbed 3%. The gold to silver ratio is now around 86, lower than its recent high near 100. Meanwhile, stock markets had their worst week in three months, as fears of a recession escalate. The Nasdaq fell 5.5% this week and is down nearly 28% YTD.
However, the recent rally highlights the underlying support among gold investors. According to the SogGen bank, investor interest in gold-backed exchange-traded funds will remain strong through 2022. The bank expects investors to buy 350 tonnes of gold-backed ETFs this year. Furthermore, analysts at SogGen are optimistic about the rise of oil prices and see the prices reaching $150.
Jerome Powell's recent speech reaffirmed the Fed's commitment to lowering inflation. He also warned investors to brace themselves for tough times and warned that rates will rise until prices fall. Although metals haven't reacted as strongly to the comments, they remain vulnerable to Fed actions. The aggressive Fed and a strong dollar last month weighed heavily on gold's performance.
Gold and silver prices are rising slowly. The US Federal Chairman Jerome Powell has hiked interest rates four times, and he plans to increase them again in 2022. In addition, investors are increasingly seeking better yields from other assets, such as the dollar. With these factors in play, gold prices are unlikely to rise much further.
Recent market positioning data have revealed that investors are firmly in favor of the dollar. This trend is likely to continue into next year. However, investors should limit their holdings of non-U.S. fixed income securities to a small percentage of their portfolios. This is to protect their profits. While dollar strength has been a positive thing for investors in recent months, there are risks associated with this trend.
The primary driver for dollar strength is the expectation of further hikes in U.S. interest rates by the Federal Reserve this year. The Fed is expected to hike rates by another 10 basis points by year-end, which would push the federal funds rate up to 2.8%. Meanwhile, the Bank of Canada is expected to hike rates by the same amount, while the Reserve Bank of Australia is expected to keep policy near zero.
The strong dollar has a direct impact on American companies that have large international operations. As a result, they are seeing their overseas sales convert into less dollars, affecting their profits. Apple is one of the companies that is particularly vulnerable, as more than 60% of its sales are generated outside of the United States. Other tech giants are also likely to feel the impact of a stronger dollar.
Another driver of dollar strength is the flow of funds into the U.S. Treasury market. Because of its large size and legal protections, investors traditionally gravitate toward the dollar as a safe haven. Although inflows have slowed this year due to the slowdown in China, the trend is still strong. And rising short-term Treasury yields make safe-keeping dollars an even more appealing option.
The wedding season is a time when jewellers and other retailers will be busier than usual. The festive demand for gold jewellery is expected to increase by as much as 35 percent this season in India. The demand for gold has boosted sales for jewellery in India and other Asian markets. However, last week's retreat in gold prices has caused losses in some sectors. Despite the lower prices, jewellers will benefit from the influx of customers looking for wedding presents.
While the price of gold is already relatively high, many jewelers and buyers are still convinced that it will remain high. In fact, the price of gold has risen so far this year, with the federation's estimates estimating that as much as 40 kilograms of gold is required every day to meet the market demand, the price of gold is unlikely to fall.
Wedding season demand for gold and silver jewellery has increased by as much as 20 per cent this season. The prices of gold and silver remain high, but they are more affordable than they have been for a while, according to Pradeep Kothari, director of Kothari Jewellers. He says that the prices are still below the record high of Rs 57,000 per kg.
Indian weddings are intrinsically linked to gold, and the demand for gold is high during this time. Wedding season is generally between October and March. Weddings require massive amounts of jewellery, and gold is also widely used in various religious and cultural festivals. India's demand for gold has been a major driver of gold prices over the past few years, and can push prices even higher.
The gold futures on MCX trade higher on Friday. The metal is trading above the 20-WMA and is heading towards the upper end of its Bollinger Band. This indicates that the precious metal could be headed towards Rs 53,150. But, the 20-WMA at Rs 51,535 is likely to act as immediate support. Furthermore, the sharp rally on Friday has triggered a 'Buy' signal on the monthly Fibonacci chart. Hence, MCX Gold is expected to continue its upward trend for the rest of the month.
Gold prices in India have been under pressure this week as the government has increased the basic Customs duty on the precious metal by five per cent. While the government is trying to cool the market, gold futures on MCX have been showing solid gains. This is largely due to the fact that the metal has been trading with a negative bias for most of the week. On Friday, however, the metal managed to record a sharp 2.8 per cent rally.
Gold prices on MCX futures in India extended their gains for the fifth consecutive session. They are now nearing an all-time high. Moreover, concerns about the euro zone debt crisis has sparked safe-haven buying in gold. As of the last trading session, the most-traded gold for August delivery was trading 0.42 percent higher at 22,797 rupees per gram. It has now climbed 2.4 percent in the previous four sessions.
After the price hike, the MahaKalyan Jewellers sell their gold at a lower rate. As a result, their profit is lost by a further Rs 2,000. However, because they've entered into a futures contract with Mr Verma, they're not able to sell it for a higher price. Therefore, they are obligated to sell the gold to Mr Verma. However, the buyer can decide not to exercise the option.
GCM Mining Corp. (GMC) is a mid-tier gold producer with a focus on Latin America. Its core business is the production of gold and silver underground in Colombia. Its Segovia Operations cover 9,000 hectares of land in the Segovia-Remedios mining district. It is also actively advancing its Toroparu Project in Guyana, one of the few remaining undeveloped gold projects in the Americas.
GCM Mining is a mid-tier gold producer with a high-quality portfolio of projects in Colombia and Guyana. Its management has decades of experience in the region. Its flagship Segovia Operation consists of four high-quality gold mines in the Segovia-Remedios mining district of Antioquia. Its portfolio also includes significant brownfield exploration prospects. Its Toroparu gold deposit is expected to begin production in 2024 and has exceptional underexplored discovery potential.
The project is expected to produce up to 5.4 million ounces of gold and 2.5 million ounces of silver over its 24-year mine life. It is located in the upper Puruni River Region in northwestern Guyana.
GCM Mining, formerly known as Gran Colombia Gold, is a mid-tier Latin American gold miner with a proven track record of mine development in Latin America. Its flagship Segovia operations cover 9,000 hectares and produce about 200,000 ounces of gold per year. While the Segovia Operations have been producing gold for over 150 years, it has recently increased its all-in sustaining costs to keep up with rising material costs. The company has a diversified project portfolio and continues to invest heavily in exploration and mine development.
GCM Mining's Toroparu Gold Project is a 538 square km land package that contains substantial resource potential. The combined company is expected to have approximately US$100 million in cash on hand, increased access to capital markets, and robust free cash flow from its Segovia Operations.
The company is advancing a major expansion and modernization of its underground mining operations at its Marmato Project in Colombia. In addition, it holds an interest in Western Atlas Resources Inc. (TSXV:WA) and Denarius Metals Corp. (TSXV:DSX). GCM has a stake of approximately 27% in each of the three companies.
GCM Mining, a mid-tier Latin American gold producer, is announcing plans to acquire all outstanding shares of Aris Gold Corporation. This will create a company with scale, cash, and a growth pipeline. The deal is expected to close in the first half of 2019. The combined company will also be the largest gold producer in Colombia.
The company's current market cap is $212 million, but its pro-forma enterprise value should be near $320 million. Its total debt is $87.5 million. In addition, the company recently increased its Marmato precious metals stream from $110 million to $175 million, and has taken a $35 million convertible loan from GCM Mining. The Marmato project is expected to produce 165,000 oz of gold per year, starting in 2024 at $900/oz.
The combined company will have a balanced mix of assets in the Americas. Its proven mineral reserves and inferred resources are expected to total 18.3 million ounces. It will also have a healthy balance sheet with $397 million in cash and another $260 million in committed funding. The company also has two large projects, the Toroparu in Guyana, and Juby in Ontario, Canada.
Among its many assets, Denarius Silver Corp. owns the Lomero Project in the Iberian Pyrite Belt, which has substantial gold reserves and good copper, zinc and lead grades. Combined, these reserves represent over $8 billion in gold equivalents. However, the project has had a difficult history, having faced several legal issues and bankruptcy proceedings.
This mid-tier Latin American gold producer has 4 operating mines in Peru and exploration in Chile and Mexico. The company is planning to increase its silver production to 40 million oz. per year by 2021. Its resource base is large, and its share price is still relatively cheap. The company has a large pipeline and a low all-in cost structure, which should translate to a large cash flow over the long-term.
The company also owns 30% of New Pacific Metals, a Bolivia-based silver company. New Pacific Metals is drilling a large silver discovery in Bolivia. Combined, these two companies have a market cap of about $500 million. But the company also needs a higher silver price to get a good return on its debt.
GoGold has a large resource base and growing in size. With a break-even cost of around $1,200 per oz. and a healthy balance sheet, Goldcorp is well-positioned to get ahead of its production costs in 2020. The company has $329 million in cash and nearly double that in warrants and options.
Western Atlas is a Canadian mining company focused on mineral exploration and development. Its principal activities are the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral deposits in premier mining jurisdictions. The company has defined several drill targets for Meadowbank. Its flagship Meadowbank project is 100% owned by Western Atlas.
The company's assets are located in Colombia and Spain. Its Colombian projects include the Gua Antigua, Segovia and Marmato projects. It also holds equity interests in Denarius Metals Corp., Aris Gold Corporation and Western Atlas Resources Inc.
The company has multiple high-quality gold mining projects in Colombia and Guyana. Its management has decades of experience in the region. Its flagship Segovia Operation is comprised of four high-grade gold mines. It also has significant brownfield exploration prospects in the same region. It is also planning to start production at its Toroparu gold deposit in Colombia by 2024. The company expects this project to have outstanding underexplored discovery potential.
The company is a mid-tier Latin American gold player. Its flagship Segovia operation is a multi-million-ounce gold mining operation in Colombia. It has been mining there for more than 150 years. Its Segovia operations comprise several underground mines in the Segovia-Remedios mining district. Its cumulative production is currently estimated at 1.3 million ounces.
Canaccord Genuity Corp. is a full-service investment bank with a strong focus on growth companies. Canaccord Genuity is based in Toronto, Canada. It provides services in the fields of research, strategy, and sales. It also advises on mergers and acquisitions. Its services target various industries, including cryptocurrency, gaming, and the metal and mining industries.
Canaccord Genuity offers merger and acquisition, corporate finance, restructuring, debt advisory, and other financial and strategic advice to corporate clients. The firm specializes in a range of sectors, including financial services, industrials, healthcare, and energy. The company was renamed Canaccord Financial in 2009 and now has four divisions - investment banking, research, sales, and trading, and fixed income.
The Canadian company also has offices in the United States, United Kingdom, and Asia. Its investment banking division provides brokerage services to individuals and institutional clients throughout North America and in the United Kingdom. It also offers wealth management services to individuals and families in the United States, Asia, and Australia. Further, it has a subsidiary in the Middle East.
Wildeboer Dellelce is a leading Canadian law firm that represents mid-tier Latin American gold producers. The firm's lawyers work with clients across traditional industries, as well as emerging markets. Its attorneys serve as both legal counsel and business strategists, providing comprehensive advice to clients.
Gran Colombia, Inc. is a Canadian mid-tier gold producer and the largest underground gold and silver miner in the country. It owns a 44% equity stake in Aris Gold Corporation and is advancing a major expansion of underground mining operations at the Marmato Project. It also holds 18% equity in Gold X Mining Corp., a company with mines in Guyana. In addition, it holds 36% equity in Denarius Silver Corp. and holds a stake in the Guia Antigua and Zancudo deposits in Colombia. The company is also involved in the Nunavut Meadowbank mine.
This press release contains forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and should not be relied upon. While these statements are generally based on current expectations and assumptions, they are not guarantees of future performance.
Wildeboer Dellelce, LLP and BMO Capital Markets have provided legal and financial advice to the Board of Gran Colombia. BMO Capital Markets has also provided an opinion on the fairness of the Gold X Arrangement.